16 out of 21 people found the following comment useful :- Very interesting story!, 8 gennaio 2007
Author:
slimebitch da Sweden
I read the previous user comment on "The hard easy" and expected the
worst. The person said "If u liked this, really, spare no costs, have a
brain surgery...". Sad to say, this person must have not seen this
movie or needs a brain surgery himself in my opinion. I would say
easily that this is the better action I have seen in a long time and
that's why I give it 8/10. Names like David Boreanaz, Bruce Dern, Gary
Busey and Peter Weller probably made this movie a bit more interesting
than it should have been. I will give "The hard easy" extra credit for
showing off David Boreanaz very nice shaped upper body. Yummy! Anyway,
this is not a movie for highly religious people. The F*** word is there
a lot. Actually, that is a word used in every other sentence. But
besides that, the story was fun and twisting. The acting was good, even
from Nick Lachey who I was not to sure about since he is a musician and
has not done much before this. I assure everyone who has some IQ and
liked this movie that you don't need a brain surgery! Watch "The hard
easy", it is a very interesting movie and if you watch it to the end,
you would get the point of this movie as well.
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :- Surprisingly Funny and Entertaining, 31 gennaio 2008
Author:
Claudio Carvalho da Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
In Los Angeles, the gambler Paul Weston (Henry Thomas) is a loser, and
owes a lot of money to the dangerous mobster Freddie (Rae Allen). When
he is brutally beaten and the life of his former wife is threatened by
the Freddie, his acquaintance bartender Vinnie (Gary Busey) sends him
to Dr. Charlie Brooks (Vera Farmiga) first and then he convinces him to
participate of a heist in the jewelry district with the professional
thief Gene (Bruce Dern) to raise the necessary money to pay his debt.
Meanwhile, the stock market broker Roger Hargitay (David Boreanaz)
finds that the company where he works embezzled US$ 5,000,000.00 from
their clients and he will be arrested in a couple of days. His boss Ed
Koster (Peter Weller) convinces Roger and two co-workers to participate
in an easy robbery of a jewelry planned by an inside man. On Saturday
morning, both gangs arrive in the same jewelry for the same heist at
the same time.
"The Hard Easy" is a surprisingly funny and entertaining movie. The
screenplay is well developed and the direction and acting are good, in
spite of the exaggerated and histrionic performance of Peter Weller.
The scene where Vera Farmiga "rapes" Henry Thomas is very sexy, and I
really liked this film. My vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "Duplo Assalto" ("Double Heist")
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :- 45 Minutes of Movie, Padded to Feature Length, 22 luglio 2008
Author:
Quicksand da Dallas, TX
David Boreanaz is not the world's greatest actor. I know this. He has
good instincts, and has even been decent in some projects, but without
an experienced director to really tell him what to do, he does tend to
come off looking a little amateurish.
Don't know who Ari Ryan is, but kudos to him for getting a film made.
I'm sure he was paid very well. But his direction is simplistic and
camera-work uninspired (and at times confusing), and for the first
hour, all the characters do is bark at one another, whining about how
they're not going to take part in a heist that we already know from the
first scene is going to take place.
There ARE a few good one-liners... but veteran actors like Peter
Weller, Bruce Dern, and even Henry Thomas (hey, he's been doing this
since 1982) know how to make it work. Gary Busey managed to act sober
for nearly all of his scenes. Vera Farmiga was a year away from "The
Departed," and certainly does her best with what's given her, though
that isn't much. Her character takes an unnecessary u-turn late in the
movie, and she motivates it as best she can. But left field is left
field, and lousy writing is lousy writing.
The rest of the performances just kind of lay there. To even call Nick
Lachey an actor is an insult to actual actors. The plot synopsis
promised two gangs of thieves doing a heist at the same bank on the
same day, but the reality is that (a) it's not a bank, it's a jewelry
store, (b) they're not thieves, they're amateurs, and (c) we see a bit
of the heist in the opening scene, then we flashback and they spend 90
minutes talking about it, to get us back there. We already know it's
going to happen, so where's the dilemma? Get to the good stuff, man,
it's fun to watch RoboCop berate people and all, but no one's going to
see your movie just because of Weller in a supporting role.
Really you could ditch most of the movies first half; Henry Thomas'
character is at least interesting (the lovable loser), but then the
movie takes a giant crap on everyone around him in the final act,
making all that set-up completely irrelevant. Boreanaz' half of the
movie isn't interesting at all; His character is a selfish,
materialistic jerk, and he's surrounded by selfish, materialistic
jerks. The audience isn't interested. Get on with it.
As a short film, this might work. It was a good idea. Unwatchable
action sequences, too much exposition and too many bad actors nearly
ruin the whole affair. The few good actors make it watchable... but
when it ends, you'll wonder what the point of the first 60 minutes was,
if the filmmakers care so little about the characters they took pains
to create.
6/10. Someone give Henry Thomas a better movie, already.
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :- A solid debut, 8 giugno 2008
Author:
GFrank1 da United States
Sure, it's a genre picture, but a stylishly directed and well acted
one. First time helmer Ryan especially gets great performances out of
the character actors (Weller and Dern) who haven't had a chance to
strut their stuff on screen like this in years. I do wish Ryan's
talents in striking a nice balance between action, noir, and drama had
been matched by a smarter screenplay (you want the plot to twist more
and not just thicken). However, all in all it's a great showcase for
some fine acting (not only by the aforementioned Weller and Dern;
Farmiga, Boreanaz, and especially Thomas also come off quite well)and
director Ryan, who seems to exhibit the same muscular craftsmanship of
a young Sidney Lumet or Michael Mann.
2 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :- "E" for effort for Nick Lachey, 17 marzo 2007
Author:
hancock11 da United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This was a good story and executed well. I have seen better and I have
seen much worse. Some of the acting felt a little forced and a little
over the top. The acting from Bruce Dern and Gary Bucey was great. Nick
Lachey was surprisingly good until his death scene which was a little
lack luster. Vera Farmiga's and Peter Weller's characters were a little
much for my taste and tended be way over the top. There weren't anymore
F bombs or violence in this film than any other films I have seen in
the past. Goodfellas is a good example. David Boreanas looked really
good in this film oh and his acting wasn't bad either. This film is by
no means a waste of time or a disappointment. I would not only
recommend this film to David Boreanaz and Nick Lachey fans but Bruce
Dern fans as well.
3 out of 12 people found the following comment useful :- liked vera farmiga, 22 febbraio 2007
Author:
Leb da Hannover, Germany
just wanted to say, that the score is absolutely terrible. even in
mid-90s this was dated. and, yes, some of the actors do a good job,
mostly it is just average. thank god vera farmiga was in this one. i
won't really recommend it. really not. what else. this e.t.guy is quite
okay in it. the plot: starts okay, but the characters are just way to
plain, and it gets worse every minute. one good thing about it, the
robbery scene is well cut, time leap forward and backward, well done,
but again sucking score and to thin characters. actually, the longer i
think about it, the thinner the people get. add some violence and ready
you are. won't complain about the f-words, didn't disturb me.
10 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :- What did i just watch?, 4 ottobre 2006
Author:
CineCritic2517 da Netherlands
Hello,
Trying my best to write a decent comment on this movie is frankly more
than this movie deserves. So I wont bother.
This was like watching a really bad episode of the A-team, was this
supposed to be a comedy? if so...why wasn't there any in it? If this
was supposed to be an action movie, then why the elaborate pointless
drama? If this was supposed to be a rip off of any and all bankjob
movies then why in Gods name didn't they just make a rip off? Oh, it
was a crime/drama ey? Sure, of course it was...silly me.
Right from the start this turkey really hits bottom, then digs. And boy
can it dig.
1/10 is generous voting and a general rating of 5.8 is plainly absurd
to the point of being insulting.
If u liked this, really, spare no costs, have a brain surgery...
7 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :- More f bombs than a prison movie!, 7 ottobre 2006
Author:
guitarcarl da United States
I would have gladly given this movie a solid 7 or 8 but I got sick of
the constant f bombs! Every character used the f word repeatedly. Even
the female doctor. The story was good, the cast was stellar the plot
worked, but the excessive use of the f word made the movie sound and
feel silly and childish. Reminded me of middle school kids smoking and
cussing at the buss stop. They think it makes them look cool but really
it does the opposite. It was over done and it distracted from the
movie.
I'm not a prude by the way; I'm a contractor that works with
construction guys all around Pearl Harbor! I'm around sailors often
enough to know why they coined the phrase "cuss like a sailor" It
doesn't bother me to hear the F word. However, I don't hear the f word
as much in a month on the job site! If the writer and director talk
like this in their professional and personal lives they need to get a
little class.
If you don't mind a constant barrage of f bombs then you are going to
like this movie. But be warned, if your kids are watching you may need
to wash some mouths out with soap before all is said and done.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videoscast e troupe completicuriositàofficial sitesfrasi memorabiliOverview
Info principalidettagli combinaticast e troupe completiProduzione/Distribuzionetv schedulePremi & e recensioni
Recensioni utenticommento/recensioneRecensioni dai NewsgroupawardsVotiparents guidealtri film raccomandatimessage boardTrama & Frasi
riassunto della tramaplot synopsisparole chiaveRecensione Amazon.comfrasi memorabiliInfo divertenti
curiositàerroricolonna sonoratitoli pazziversioni alternativeCollegamenti ad altri filmFAQIncassi & e altre info
acquisto di prodottibox office/businessdate di uscitaluoghi delle ripresespecifiche tecnicheversione laserdiscversione DVDinformazioni bibliograficheNewsDeskMateriale promozionale
slogan trailers and videos poster e link Galleria fotograficaLink esterni
link di cinemaofficial sitesvariefotografiesound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
The Hard Easy (2005)
16 out of 21 people found the following comment useful :-

Very interesting story!, 8 gennaio 2007
Author: slimebitch da Sweden
I read the previous user comment on "The hard easy" and expected the worst. The person said "If u liked this, really, spare no costs, have a brain surgery...". Sad to say, this person must have not seen this movie or needs a brain surgery himself in my opinion. I would say easily that this is the better action I have seen in a long time and that's why I give it 8/10. Names like David Boreanaz, Bruce Dern, Gary Busey and Peter Weller probably made this movie a bit more interesting than it should have been. I will give "The hard easy" extra credit for showing off David Boreanaz very nice shaped upper body. Yummy! Anyway, this is not a movie for highly religious people. The F*** word is there a lot. Actually, that is a word used in every other sentence. But besides that, the story was fun and twisting. The acting was good, even from Nick Lachey who I was not to sure about since he is a musician and has not done much before this. I assure everyone who has some IQ and liked this movie that you don't need a brain surgery! Watch "The hard easy", it is a very interesting movie and if you watch it to the end, you would get the point of this movie as well.
8 out of 10 people found the following comment useful :-

Surprisingly Funny and Entertaining, 31 gennaio 2008
Author: Claudio Carvalho da Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
In Los Angeles, the gambler Paul Weston (Henry Thomas) is a loser, and owes a lot of money to the dangerous mobster Freddie (Rae Allen). When he is brutally beaten and the life of his former wife is threatened by the Freddie, his acquaintance bartender Vinnie (Gary Busey) sends him to Dr. Charlie Brooks (Vera Farmiga) first and then he convinces him to participate of a heist in the jewelry district with the professional thief Gene (Bruce Dern) to raise the necessary money to pay his debt. Meanwhile, the stock market broker Roger Hargitay (David Boreanaz) finds that the company where he works embezzled US$ 5,000,000.00 from their clients and he will be arrested in a couple of days. His boss Ed Koster (Peter Weller) convinces Roger and two co-workers to participate in an easy robbery of a jewelry planned by an inside man. On Saturday morning, both gangs arrive in the same jewelry for the same heist at the same time.
"The Hard Easy" is a surprisingly funny and entertaining movie. The screenplay is well developed and the direction and acting are good, in spite of the exaggerated and histrionic performance of Peter Weller. The scene where Vera Farmiga "rapes" Henry Thomas is very sexy, and I really liked this film. My vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "Duplo Assalto" ("Double Heist")
0 out of 1 people found the following comment useful :-

45 Minutes of Movie, Padded to Feature Length, 22 luglio 2008
Author: Quicksand da Dallas, TX
David Boreanaz is not the world's greatest actor. I know this. He has good instincts, and has even been decent in some projects, but without an experienced director to really tell him what to do, he does tend to come off looking a little amateurish.
Don't know who Ari Ryan is, but kudos to him for getting a film made. I'm sure he was paid very well. But his direction is simplistic and camera-work uninspired (and at times confusing), and for the first hour, all the characters do is bark at one another, whining about how they're not going to take part in a heist that we already know from the first scene is going to take place.
There ARE a few good one-liners... but veteran actors like Peter Weller, Bruce Dern, and even Henry Thomas (hey, he's been doing this since 1982) know how to make it work. Gary Busey managed to act sober for nearly all of his scenes. Vera Farmiga was a year away from "The Departed," and certainly does her best with what's given her, though that isn't much. Her character takes an unnecessary u-turn late in the movie, and she motivates it as best she can. But left field is left field, and lousy writing is lousy writing.
The rest of the performances just kind of lay there. To even call Nick Lachey an actor is an insult to actual actors. The plot synopsis promised two gangs of thieves doing a heist at the same bank on the same day, but the reality is that (a) it's not a bank, it's a jewelry store, (b) they're not thieves, they're amateurs, and (c) we see a bit of the heist in the opening scene, then we flashback and they spend 90 minutes talking about it, to get us back there. We already know it's going to happen, so where's the dilemma? Get to the good stuff, man, it's fun to watch RoboCop berate people and all, but no one's going to see your movie just because of Weller in a supporting role.
Really you could ditch most of the movies first half; Henry Thomas' character is at least interesting (the lovable loser), but then the movie takes a giant crap on everyone around him in the final act, making all that set-up completely irrelevant. Boreanaz' half of the movie isn't interesting at all; His character is a selfish, materialistic jerk, and he's surrounded by selfish, materialistic jerks. The audience isn't interested. Get on with it.
As a short film, this might work. It was a good idea. Unwatchable action sequences, too much exposition and too many bad actors nearly ruin the whole affair. The few good actors make it watchable... but when it ends, you'll wonder what the point of the first 60 minutes was, if the filmmakers care so little about the characters they took pains to create.
6/10. Someone give Henry Thomas a better movie, already.
1 out of 3 people found the following comment useful :-

A solid debut, 8 giugno 2008
Author: GFrank1 da United States
Sure, it's a genre picture, but a stylishly directed and well acted one. First time helmer Ryan especially gets great performances out of the character actors (Weller and Dern) who haven't had a chance to strut their stuff on screen like this in years. I do wish Ryan's talents in striking a nice balance between action, noir, and drama had been matched by a smarter screenplay (you want the plot to twist more and not just thicken). However, all in all it's a great showcase for some fine acting (not only by the aforementioned Weller and Dern; Farmiga, Boreanaz, and especially Thomas also come off quite well)and director Ryan, who seems to exhibit the same muscular craftsmanship of a young Sidney Lumet or Michael Mann.
2 out of 6 people found the following comment useful :-

"E" for effort for Nick Lachey, 17 marzo 2007
Author: hancock11 da United States
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This was a good story and executed well. I have seen better and I have seen much worse. Some of the acting felt a little forced and a little over the top. The acting from Bruce Dern and Gary Bucey was great. Nick Lachey was surprisingly good until his death scene which was a little lack luster. Vera Farmiga's and Peter Weller's characters were a little much for my taste and tended be way over the top. There weren't anymore F bombs or violence in this film than any other films I have seen in the past. Goodfellas is a good example. David Boreanas looked really good in this film oh and his acting wasn't bad either. This film is by no means a waste of time or a disappointment. I would not only recommend this film to David Boreanaz and Nick Lachey fans but Bruce Dern fans as well.
3 out of 12 people found the following comment useful :-

liked vera farmiga, 22 febbraio 2007
Author: Leb da Hannover, Germany
just wanted to say, that the score is absolutely terrible. even in mid-90s this was dated. and, yes, some of the actors do a good job, mostly it is just average. thank god vera farmiga was in this one. i won't really recommend it. really not. what else. this e.t.guy is quite okay in it. the plot: starts okay, but the characters are just way to plain, and it gets worse every minute. one good thing about it, the robbery scene is well cut, time leap forward and backward, well done, but again sucking score and to thin characters. actually, the longer i think about it, the thinner the people get. add some violence and ready you are. won't complain about the f-words, didn't disturb me.
10 out of 34 people found the following comment useful :-

What did i just watch?, 4 ottobre 2006
Author: CineCritic2517 da Netherlands
Hello,
Trying my best to write a decent comment on this movie is frankly more than this movie deserves. So I wont bother.
This was like watching a really bad episode of the A-team, was this supposed to be a comedy? if so...why wasn't there any in it? If this was supposed to be an action movie, then why the elaborate pointless drama? If this was supposed to be a rip off of any and all bankjob movies then why in Gods name didn't they just make a rip off? Oh, it was a crime/drama ey? Sure, of course it was...silly me.
Right from the start this turkey really hits bottom, then digs. And boy can it dig.
1/10 is generous voting and a general rating of 5.8 is plainly absurd to the point of being insulting.
If u liked this, really, spare no costs, have a brain surgery...
7 out of 29 people found the following comment useful :-

More f bombs than a prison movie!, 7 ottobre 2006
Author: guitarcarl da United States
I would have gladly given this movie a solid 7 or 8 but I got sick of the constant f bombs! Every character used the f word repeatedly. Even the female doctor. The story was good, the cast was stellar the plot worked, but the excessive use of the f word made the movie sound and feel silly and childish. Reminded me of middle school kids smoking and cussing at the buss stop. They think it makes them look cool but really it does the opposite. It was over done and it distracted from the movie.
I'm not a prude by the way; I'm a contractor that works with construction guys all around Pearl Harbor! I'm around sailors often enough to know why they coined the phrase "cuss like a sailor" It doesn't bother me to hear the F word. However, I don't hear the f word as much in a month on the job site! If the writer and director talk like this in their professional and personal lives they need to get a little class.
If you don't mind a constant barrage of f bombs then you are going to like this movie. But be warned, if your kids are watching you may need to wash some mouths out with soap before all is said and done.
Add another comment
Related Links