Home
SHOP CASINO...
Amazon.com Amazon.ca Amazon.co.uk Amazon.de Amazon.fr
IMDb > Casino Royale (2006)
Casino Royale
[Add to My Movies]
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videoscast e troupe completicuriositàofficial sitesfrasi memorabili
Overview
Info principalidettagli combinaticast e troupe completiProduzione/Distribuzionetv schedule
Premi & e recensioni
Recensioni utenticommento/recensioneRecensioni dai NewsgroupawardsVotiparents guidealtri film raccomandatimessage board
Trama & Frasi
riassunto della tramaplot synopsisparole chiaveRecensione Amazon.comfrasi memorabili
Info divertenti
curiositàerroricolonna sonoratitoli pazziversioni alternativeCollegamenti ad altri filmFAQ
Incassi & e altre info
acquisto di prodottibox office/businessdate di uscitaluoghi delle ripresespecifiche tecnicheversione laserdiscversione DVDinformazioni bibliograficheNewsDesk
Materiale promozionale
slogan trailers and videos poster e link Galleria fotografica
Link esterni
link di cinemaofficial sitesvariefotografiesound clipsvideo clips

Casino Royale (2006)

advertisement
Register or login to rate this title
Voti degli utenti: 8.0/10 (124,573 votes)
Photos (see all 76 | slideshow) Videos (see all 10)

Overview

Regista:
Martin Campbell
Writers (WGA):
Neal Purvis (screenplay) &
Robert Wade (screenplay) ...
ancora
Data di uscita:
17 novembre 2006 (USA) ancora view trailer
Slogan:
Everyone has a past. Every legend has a beginning. On November 17th, discover how James...became Bond. ancora
Plot:
In his first mission, James Bond must stop Le Chiffre, a banker to the world's terrorist organizations, from winning a high-stakes poker tournament at Casino Royale in Montenegro. full summary | full synopsis
Premi:
Won BAFTA Film Award. Another 15 wins & 25 nominations ancora
Recensioni degli utenti:
"Millenium" series James Bond - top-of-the-line! ancora

Cast

 (Cast overview, first billed only)

Additional Details

Alias:
Bond Begins (USA) (fake working title)
James Bond 007 - Casino Royale (Germany)
James Bond 21 (USA) (working title)
ancora
MPAA:
Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violent action, a scene of torture, sexual content and nudity.
Durata:
144 min
Lingua:
Inglese
Aspect Ratio:
2.35 : 1 ancora
Divieti:
Norway:15 | Belgium:KT | Portugal:M/12 | Argentina:13 | Sweden:15 | Germany:12 | South Africa:13V | Hong Kong:IIA | South Korea:15 | Netherlands:12 | Canada:PG (Nova Scotia/Ontario) | New Zealand:M | Peru:14 | Denmark:11 | Philippines:PG-13 (MTRCB) | Singapore:PG | Malaysia:U | Canada:13+ (Quebec) | Ireland:15A | Switzerland:14 (canton of Geneva) | Canada:14A (Alberta/British Columbia/Manitoba) | Finland:K-15 | Brazil:14 | Switzerland:14 (canton of Vaud) | UK:12A (cinema rating) | Australia:M | Spain:18 | USA:PG-13 (certificate #42012) | UK:12 (video rating) | France:U (with warning)
MOVIEmeter: ?
^ 13% since last week why?

Info divertenti

Curiosità:
The license plate number of the gold colored Range Rover that James Bond crashes in the Ocean Club car park in the Bahamas was 161138. ancora
Errori:
Continuity: Miami airport worker stands next to the truck when killed. Later, his body is a few meters away from the truck. ancora
Citazioni:
[first lines]
James Bond: M really doesn't mind you earning a little money on the side, Dryden. She'd just prefer it if it wasn't selling secrets.
ancora
Movie Connections:
Fa riferimento a Notorious (1946) ancora
Colonna sonora:
Linstead Market ancora

FAQ

Who is the one-eyed guy at the end of the movie?
Can Daniel Craig drive manual cars?
Is this a prequel?
ancora
68 out of 104 people found the following comment useful:-
"Millenium" series James Bond - top-of-the-line!, 22 November 2006
10/10
Author: (winner55) da United States

In the original Bond series, only a handful of films really attempted to touch base with the novels of Ian Fleming. "Dr. No" showed the Fleming feeling for character and action, but introduced elements to the plot that detracted from the 'hard-boiled' spy story that Fleming thought he was writing; "Thunderball" came close, but that was because Fleming developed the story on commission for the film. "On Her Majesty's Secret Service" had the book's plot pretty down pat, and was made in a kind of 'grand adventure' style, but of course it suffered from the choice of Lazenby - a professional model, not an actor - as Bond. "The Living Daylights" showed the producers' interest in returning to the roots, but Dalton was uncomfortable playing Bond, and uncomfortable with the wisecracks which had become part of the character's schtick - and which were really badly written for the Dalton films. "Goldeneye" was admirable attempt to update the Fleming milieu for the end of the Cold War, but left the character himself as yet without an 'updated' definition.

The decision to make a 21st Century version of Fleming's first Bond novel - and, beyond the update, to remain true to the novel, sans comic patter, sans sci-fi techno-schtick, sans major rewrite of the basic plot - promised to present Bond fans of all ages with a direct challenge. Do we want the hard-boiled spy Fleming first envisioned - patterned after Chandler's Philip Marlowe and W. Somerset Maughm's Ashenden ("or: The British Agent")? Or would we really rather have the suave stand-up comedian and Playboy magazine contributor introduced by Broccoli, Maibaum, Young, and company, in the second Connery film, "From Russia With Love"?

Well, the votes are still being tallied on that.

As someone who came to Bond reading "Goldfinger" at the tender age of twelve (the phrase "round, firm, pointed breasts" has been an inspiration to me since), the closer the films came to the sense of the novels, the happier I was.

So of course, this version of Bond is a joyous surprise for me - my youthful daydreams have been vindicated and at last fully satisfied. There are indeed elements added to the plot, but they are completely congruent with it. There is the use of current technology, but no techno-schtick - i.e., no Q. and no "gadgets". There are the luscious Bond babes (2 - the minimum Bond requirement), but there is no attempt to reduce them to photogenic sex-toys.

Fleming's plot actually requires the film's addition of some heavy action sequences (all done very snappy, with a brutally realistic edge), because the novel is very claustrophobic; the original TV version of the story (1955, with Barry Nelson as 'Jimmy Bond'), only used three indoor sets, because it could - except for the car chase and an attempted bombing at an outdoor café, Fleming's novel took place almost entirely within Bond's hotel suite and the gaming room. The film's opening this novel out to the world is actually quite welcome, and does not affect the central plot or its theme.

The character of Bond presented in this film may disappoint followers of the original films, but the news is, this is FLEMING's Bond - an orphan uncertain of his own identity, a disillusioned romantic trying hard to pretend he's incapable of emotions, a middle class, middle-brow, middle-level management type who just happens to kill people for a living. But he does it extremely well.

The other problem some general viewers may have is the level of violence in the film; having determined to film the novel realistically, director Martin Campbell has decided to ditch the 'B-movie' violence of most of the earlier films, and present us the violence with a hard 'British neo-noir' edge to it. Given the romantic plot twist toward the end, this would be a perfect date movie - except that the violence left some of the female viewers in the theater I attended clearly unsettled. That's not necessarily a bad thing, it just is part of the gestalt of the film's experience.

Cambell's direction is very good; the writing is crisp; production values are very high; the photography is stunning. Some of the stunt work is truly remarkable, worthy competition for Jackie Chan. The acting is rock-solid and believable for these characters. There is plenty of muscle for the action-film fan, and some real brains for the more general viewer to ponder later.

This film is best viewed with minimal reliance on knowledge of the previous series. In fact, it functions perfectly well as a 'one-off', a film without a series.

But of course, the ending invites a sequel. In Godzilla terms, Connery and Moore having given us the 'showa' Bond, Dalton and Brosnan the "Heisei" Bond, we now have the "Millenium" series James Bond - not a prequel nor even a 'reboot', but, really, an entirely new series about the same character. It is probably too much to hope for, but maybe they can make the sequels just as good as this.

As a genre film it never quite lifts above its genre; so normally I would only give it "nine stars" as a film.

However, as a film within its genre, it is top-of-the-line - so it gets a ten.

Was the above comment useful to you?
ancora

Message Boards

Discuss this title with other users on IMDb message board for Casino Royale (2006)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Who is the better bond:Pierce Brosnan or Daniel Craig ? unsafe_pilot1
Bond's line in the train scene seger_now
Best 5 bonds betterman21
Best Bond movie ever??? gunners08
casino royale trailer - recut CrackSpidersBitch
ancora

Raccomandazioni

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Live Free or Die Hard GoldenEye Die Another Day The World Is Not Enough Thunderball
IMDb Voti degli utenti:
IMDb Voti degli utenti:
IMDb Voti degli utenti:
IMDb Voti degli utenti:
IMDb Voti degli utenti:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
Articoli news IMDb Action section Add this title to MyMovies

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Update' button will take you through a step-by-step process.