268 out of 319 people found the following comment useful :- The Greatest Pro/Anti-War Movie Ever Made, 11 settembre 2002
Author:
jamesjlr2 da Houston
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
_Starship Troopers_ is the greatest pro/anti-war film ever made. This is
something that no one seems to recognize considering that, when it was
first
released, most critics seemed to have been somewhat disturbed by the fact
that the `good guys' resembled Nazis and that was about as far as they
went
before blowing it off as just another shoot-em-up. No one has bothered to
re-assess the film since. Why has Starship Troopers with its profound
comments on war and human nature been relegated to the ranks of films like
_Rambo_ and _Universal Soldier_? One reason is that the satire is
extremely
subtle and another is that people are prejudiced against action films.
This
is probably justified though since the vast majority of them are pure
fluff.
However, _Starship Troopers_ ruthlessly satirizes the genre while being
one
of the best of in its category, which is a feat that is quite brilliant.
There is so much about this film to analyze and it might even take a book
to
cover it all, so I will stick to only one thing here: the alien bugs,
which
are the enemy in the film.
The Earth is at war with these creatures. They're inhuman, vicious. This
is
graphically demonstrated through out the film but most notably via a
propaganda website that the movie presents to us as a futuristic version
of
`Why We Fight'. At one point, a cow is lead into a pen holding one of
these
giant insects, which quickly cleaves the cow in two. We are horrified!
These
insects truly are barbaric, evil! Look what it did to that cow! They must
be
destroyed! (Yet how many of us had steak before seeing this movie?) Then
the
website narrator proudly states that people on Earth are doing their part
in
the war effort as we watch a woman and her children dump Earth bugs on the
ground and stomp on them. These bugs are native to our planet. Like the
American-Japanese in WWII, why are they getting picked on? How are the
bug-stomping mother and her children any more humane and caring than the
repulsive alien insects?
The film is insanely violent. People are literally cut to pieces by the
smaller creatures and slowly, painfully melted by a plasma the larger
insects spray. However, the alien bugs fair no better. The people and cows
getting hacked up relentlessly in this film horrify us but we cheer as
machine rifles and grenades blow the giant insects apart. The body count
is
high on both sides. It is all literally and purposely utter, senseless
violence. But then at one point a psychic uses his powers to read one of
the
alien's emotions. He triumphantly yells, `It's afraid!' and a legion of
human warriors jubilantly cheer at this pronouncement. Who's barbaric
here?
What is humanity? These bugs are clearly not `human' yet they are
intelligent, advanced, and most importantly they have feelings. If they
can
be afraid, can they not also be sad, happy, in love? These are questions
the
writer has left to us to ask with out leading us by the hand through what
could have been a much more preachy film.
Considering the fact that, in his book _Stranger in a Strange Land_,
Robert
A. Heinlein--who wrote the novel upon which Starship Troopers was
based--pointed out that there were millions of people already in America
before the Europeans came and ruthlessly slaughtered these `subhumans' on
their new property, it is safe to say that there is a lot more going on in
this film than a simple slug-fest. The dazzling special effects and heart
pounding action are all just a distraction--like all the noise in real
life--from the more important things said here. Even the trailer and
commercials for this movie were purposely misleading with Blur's
delightfully mindless `Song #3' blaring and the singer yelling `Whoo-hoo!'
as a stream of soldiers pour out of ships to go to battle. Every aspect of
the film was one gigantic, satirical slap in the face of humanity and no
one
noticed.
Some may suggest that the satire was not intended but that would be
incredibly insulting to screenwriter Edward Neumeier because that's what
he
excels at. If you didn't catch the not so subtle satire in his earlier
screenplay for _Robocop_ then you're under the age of ten. Despite being
so
financially successful, _Starship Troopers_ is one of the most important,
yet overlooked, movies of the 1990s from an intellectual point of view.
273 out of 351 people found the following comment useful :- Best satire since Dr. Strangelove, 23 luglio 2003
Author:
Max Gardner da Middletown, DE
Starship Troopers is a subtle and insidiously subversive movie that proved
frighteningly prescient in the wake of post-9/11 uberpatriotism. Both
Heinlein's book and Verhoeven's film are valid and interesting political
statements at opposite ends of the spectrum. Heinlein's novel was
criticized as fascist at the time of its publication, and for all his
obvious talent as a writer I'm inclined to agree. The movie is as much a
sendup of the original novel as it is a satire of jingoist American
politics. It really is a shame that despite the squeaky-clean heroes
plucked straight from the soaps, the Mormon extremists, the multiple-amputee
mobile infantry retirees and the propaganda shorts masquerading as news, the
vast majority still seems to regard Starship Troopers as a stupid action
movie and, for some reason, absolutely refuse to consider that it might be
something more.
10/10
248 out of 308 people found the following comment useful :- Better -- and more disturbing -- each time I watch it, 28 luglio 2004
Author:
obiwan26 da Washington, DC
This movie never fails to generate strong reactions, both positive and
negative.
Much of the negative criticizes the wooden acting, soap-opera beautiful
stars, and unreasonably military tactics that lead to an enormous human body
count.
But that misses the whole point. The actors and plotlines are supposed to
be caricatures of themselves. We are presented with a seemingly utopian
society, where everyone is beautiful, the world is united under a single
government, and patriotism is rampant.
The further the movie goes, the more the viewer realizes just how horrific
this supposed utopia really is. Patriotism is exploited to trick young men
and women into going off to a pointless war. The beautiful people are
mercilessly chopped to pieces by their insectoid opponents. And the united
world government uses its control of the media to brainwash the public into
supporting this bloody war.
Yes, the Nazi symbolism is a little heavy-handed. But that's the whole
point -- the intertwining of this "perfect" society with such a deeply evil
subtext is supposed to be disturbing. What's even more disturbing is how
close to our recent (American) history this movie truly is. Yes, it's a
caricature, but it's a caricature of a very real and frightening
phenomenon.
How different are the government propaganda ads in Starship Troopers from
the "Loose Lips Sink Ships" campaign or the "10% for War Bonds" posters in
1940s U.S.? How dangerous is it to have a society where everyone looks the
same, thinks the same, and acts the same, even to their own death? This is
the message behind Starship Troopers, and it's a chilling one at
that.
And for me, it works.
166 out of 250 people found the following comment useful :- Its AFRAID !!, 4 ottobre 2002
Author:
KelticKarma da Ireland
One of my favourite films, this one.
I love the way Verhoeven approached the idea of Man v Beast. Our "heros" are
beautiful, white-teethed Americans, firm of body and morals; our villains
are decapitating stick insects, cockroaches, and giant maggots.
Yet who are the real heroes ?
The white-teethed Americans are vacuous, shallow thugs. They are thrust into
a war with the Bugs, whose planets, we are told, have been invaded by the
Americans. The Bugs are justifiably annoyed.
I couldn't help but laugh at some of the "Nazi" parallels drawn by other
reviewers. What Verhoeven is putting across in this film is not a polemic
against Nazi ideology, but an attack upon American Imperialism in the latter
part of the last century. He is satirising American crusades against other
countries, whose inhabitants are portrayed in the American press as no
better than Bugs.
Had Verhoeven wished to attack Nazism, he could have given the good guys
German accents; he didn't, he gave them American accents. The "Nazi"
symbolism as commented upon by other reviewers is not Nazi symbolism at all
- it is totalitarian symbolism, full stop. It is right-wing, "bomb them back
to the stone age" American totalitarianism.
Why do I believe this ?
Check out the scene where American kids are encouraged to stamp on
cockroaches by an overly excited parent. Check out the high
fives.
Verhoeven has done a mighty job here. He has made a film which has great
action, great cinematography, very cute women (and boys) and yet the film
still manages to take the mickey out of the New Order in a very funny and
effective manner.
10/10
111 out of 145 people found the following comment useful :- The negative buzz kept me from watching this film for awhile, but I'm glad I've seen it now!, 22 gennaio 2005
Author:
Brandt Sponseller da New York City
Based on the famous Robert A. Heinlein novel, Starship Troopers is set
in a world of the future where militarism is the norm, largely because
we've discovered alien civilizations of huge insect-like creatures and
we're at war with them. The film follows a quartet of high school
friends as they make their varied ways through the military.
Starship Troopers is both a tongue-in-cheek satire of society and an
intense sci-fi/action/war film filled with horror-like insect monsters
and a healthy dose of graphic gore. That's a genre combination that
will not please all viewers, especially if the tongue-in-cheek humor
goes over their heads. For those more in tune with the genre melding,
Starship Troopers promises a quick, edge-of-your-seat ride from the
first moments to the last.
The film can be looked at in three sections, with slight crossovers
from one section to another. The first is focused on the social satire.
The cultural differences of the future are given in mostly indirectly,
and occasionally, the point is what hasn't changed, or perhaps what is
currently (per the film's setting) in vogue as a retro element. The
second and third sections could be seen as a sci-fi Platoon (1986),
with the second section focused on military basic training and the
third focused on wartime. Like Platoon, the basic training scenes show
order and a clear sense of purpose, while the wartime scenes show
comparative chaos.
That the film could be compared to something like Platoon shows that
although director Paul Verhoeven and screenwriter Edward Neumeier are
aware that the material could easily be seen as absurd, they have the
chops to make it believable and suspenseful at the same time.
This is not to say that Starship Troopers is a rip-off of any other
movie. The film-making here is highly original, and we could almost see
the entire film as a computer-based CNN-styled collection of wartime
newsreels of the future. It remains quick, witty and intense
throughout. My only regret is that they didn't incorporate Yes' song
Starship Troopers in the score somehow.
128 out of 211 people found the following comment useful :- Brilliant & timely critique of fascism, 11 agosto 2004
Author:
Delysid da Vancouver, BC, Canada
The truth is that this is a brilliant film that, like Verhoeven's
earlier "Robocop", is an insightful satire and critique of fascism and
at the same time succeeds as a sci-fi thriller. It can be enjoyed at
both levels, though obviously it is much richer when the viewer
comprehends the satirical and critical level as well.
It's not as if the satire is so subtle it's hard to get. If anything,
it hits you over the head with it. But at the same time, it is very
disciplined and consistent in not tipping its hand and giving the game
away, which to me makes it much more successful and enjoyable than if
the satire and social critique were blatantly broadcast. That's the
strange and wonderful thing about "Starship Troopers" and "Robocop" --
one viewer might totally not get it, while to another, the
critical/satirical level is totally in your face and is what the film
is really all about.
I don't know if I'm describing it well, but watch it with the
film-makers' commentary turned on (on the DVD version), and director
Paul Verhoeven and writer Ed Neumeier lay it all out very clearly: the
film is about how war makes fascists of us all. Very timely today
(2004) with US imperialism wreaking havoc in Iraq & Afghanistan.
On a technical level, the film is excellent. The bug special effects
are top notch and the whole bug society and hierarchy is deeply thought
through, as is the future Earth society's politics and technology. The
acting is excellent, and the balance between the characters'
interpersonal story line, the bug war story line, and the underlying
political satire and critique, is perfectly handled.
A truly exceptional film, Verhoeven's best so far, topping even
"Robocop" in my opinion, and fully deserving a 10 out of 10 score,
which I rarely give.
84 out of 124 people found the following comment useful :- LOVED IT!!!!!, 21 dicembre 1998
Author:
Nick Pfitzner da Sydney, Australia
While some of the characters and lines in the movie were a little
underdeveloped, the overriding story of the evolution of our society into an
aggressive, militarist regime cannot be ignored. The action scenes were
great, with flawless computer animation (how Titanic beat it for SFX I will
never know) and enhancement supported by what can only be described as
gore-laden prosthetics. I thought they could have left the love story out,
but that's Hollywood.
Very watchable, and a nice change from the Alien movies - this is WAR, not
some isolated pit-fight! I love the Alien movies, but Startship troopers
just has a lot o' lead, heads, and bodies flying left, right and centre! I
thought the Mobile Infantry could have used better weaponry (apparently in
the novel that it's based on, the MI has powered armour with assault cannon
and missile launchers etc.) to battle such a foe, but I'm just being
technical.
If you want a nice beer & pretzels movie to yell and scream at, then this is
it.
10 out of 10
70 out of 100 people found the following comment useful :- An Incredibly Good Film?, 8 agosto 1998
Author:
Gary V. Foss da Whittier, CA
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This is either a really good, surprisingly intelligent satire of sci-fi
and war films in general (particularly the WWII era recruitment films that
Hollywood cranked out like they were actually a part of the War
Department)
or an incredibly vapid film that should only be watched for it's
glitzy,
flash-bang qualities. I choose to believe the former, otherwise I can't
justify watching it as many times as I have, and I'm not nearly as
smart as
I think I am.... ST is only anecdotally related to Heinlien's novel, a
choice made for various reasons, probably linked to the possibility of
a
sequel. Verhoeven raided the casts of various soap operas for his
characters, a decision that exemplifies the portrayal of killing the
enemy as a glamorous occupation in most war films, and the dialogue is filled
with ironic machismo of the kind that can only be deeply satirical. (I
hope.) FX are fantastic as are the one-liners. Don't watch this film
and
Arachnaphobia in the same 24 hour period or you'll spend a month's
salary
on bugspray.
P.S. The proximity of this film to the Ra-Ra Homecoming of American
troops
from the Gulf War should also not be ignored....
66 out of 98 people found the following comment useful :- It's all about the battle, not the enemy., 17 dicembre 1998
Author:
Scott C. Webb (scott.webb@mpwengineering.com) da Tulsa, OK, USA
This movie is about war and militaristic society and its effect on mankind.
I agree with Leonard Maltin (the professional movie critic) that everything
is directly modeled on WWII battles and WWII movies.
The enemy is irrelevant, and characterizing the enemy is not important.
That is why we never get any explanation for why the bugs are attacking us,
how their weapons work, etc.
The movie is extremely gory to make the point that "war is hell", and war
consists of a lot of "blood and guts". It is also making the point that our
tolerance for violence is constantly accelerating. In this future world, it
is no big deal to get stabbed through any part of the body, it is even a
part of military training. Pain is of no concern, you simply call for
"Medic!" and get on down the road.
The movie does not try to be cute or funny. The viewer does not have to
listen to the aliens being called all sort of combinations of cuss words by
the heroes.
The characters are realistic. They sometimes do the right things for the
wrong reasons and vice versa. At times we are not sure who is good and who
is self-motivated.
I also liked the shower scene. Just the concept of 19 year-old,
physically-fit, men and women casually showering and bunking together is
fascinating.
It is obviously one of those movies that you either love or
hate.
76 out of 119 people found the following comment useful :- Pure Science Fiction, 26 marzo 2004
Author:
Freemheart da Chile
Again the same story of: "go to watch a movie after read
many reviews telling you how bad it's the movie just to find something
incredible" and really it was. I remember wait to see and action film about
great space heroes, and even when I found heroes and action, I found a
awesome and satirical story about the evolution of the human race and how
the path of war falls in a road to hell. More than that, Starship troopers
it's that kind of science fiction films with great a big special effects but
at the same time a terrific script. A shocking story, more realistic and
cruel than many movies about real conflicts, where you can feel the havoc
and the pain of any battle.
The acting it's good, the soundtrack it's one of the best
works of Basil Poleoduris. After this you can read the book of Robert
Heinlein founding how far goes Paul Verhoeven in every scene and every
character creating. But the best of all is how everything has a reason,
there's no word or scene without a meaning, even the promise of the
beginning remain intact making clear some disturbing things about some
character(s). An movie to watch more than two times.
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videoscast e troupe completicuriositàofficial sitesfrasi memorabiliOverview
Info principalidettagli combinaticast e troupe completiProduzione/Distribuzionetv schedulePremi & e recensioni
Recensioni utenticommento/recensioneRecensioni dai NewsgroupawardsVotiparents guidealtri film raccomandatimessage boardTrama & Frasi
riassunto della tramaplot synopsisparole chiaveRecensione Amazon.comfrasi memorabiliInfo divertenti
curiositàerroricolonna sonoratitoli pazziversioni alternativeCollegamenti ad altri filmFAQIncassi & e altre info
acquisto di prodottibox office/businessdate di uscitaluoghi delle ripresespecifiche tecnicheversione laserdiscversione DVDinformazioni bibliograficheArticoli newsMateriale promozionale
slogantrailers and videosposter e linkGalleria fotograficaLink esterni
link di cinemaofficial sitesvariefotografiesound clipsvideo clipsIMDb user comments for
Starship Troopers (1997)
268 out of 319 people found the following comment useful :-

The Greatest Pro/Anti-War Movie Ever Made, 11 settembre 2002
Author: jamesjlr2 da Houston
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
_Starship Troopers_ is the greatest pro/anti-war film ever made. This is something that no one seems to recognize considering that, when it was first released, most critics seemed to have been somewhat disturbed by the fact that the `good guys' resembled Nazis and that was about as far as they went before blowing it off as just another shoot-em-up. No one has bothered to re-assess the film since. Why has Starship Troopers with its profound comments on war and human nature been relegated to the ranks of films like _Rambo_ and _Universal Soldier_? One reason is that the satire is extremely subtle and another is that people are prejudiced against action films. This is probably justified though since the vast majority of them are pure fluff. However, _Starship Troopers_ ruthlessly satirizes the genre while being one of the best of in its category, which is a feat that is quite brilliant. There is so much about this film to analyze and it might even take a book to cover it all, so I will stick to only one thing here: the alien bugs, which are the enemy in the film.
The Earth is at war with these creatures. They're inhuman, vicious. This is graphically demonstrated through out the film but most notably via a propaganda website that the movie presents to us as a futuristic version of `Why We Fight'. At one point, a cow is lead into a pen holding one of these giant insects, which quickly cleaves the cow in two. We are horrified! These insects truly are barbaric, evil! Look what it did to that cow! They must be destroyed! (Yet how many of us had steak before seeing this movie?) Then the website narrator proudly states that people on Earth are doing their part in the war effort as we watch a woman and her children dump Earth bugs on the ground and stomp on them. These bugs are native to our planet. Like the American-Japanese in WWII, why are they getting picked on? How are the bug-stomping mother and her children any more humane and caring than the repulsive alien insects?
The film is insanely violent. People are literally cut to pieces by the smaller creatures and slowly, painfully melted by a plasma the larger insects spray. However, the alien bugs fair no better. The people and cows getting hacked up relentlessly in this film horrify us but we cheer as machine rifles and grenades blow the giant insects apart. The body count is high on both sides. It is all literally and purposely utter, senseless violence. But then at one point a psychic uses his powers to read one of the alien's emotions. He triumphantly yells, `It's afraid!' and a legion of human warriors jubilantly cheer at this pronouncement. Who's barbaric here? What is humanity? These bugs are clearly not `human' yet they are intelligent, advanced, and most importantly they have feelings. If they can be afraid, can they not also be sad, happy, in love? These are questions the writer has left to us to ask with out leading us by the hand through what could have been a much more preachy film.
Considering the fact that, in his book _Stranger in a Strange Land_, Robert A. Heinlein--who wrote the novel upon which Starship Troopers was based--pointed out that there were millions of people already in America before the Europeans came and ruthlessly slaughtered these `subhumans' on their new property, it is safe to say that there is a lot more going on in this film than a simple slug-fest. The dazzling special effects and heart pounding action are all just a distraction--like all the noise in real life--from the more important things said here. Even the trailer and commercials for this movie were purposely misleading with Blur's delightfully mindless `Song #3' blaring and the singer yelling `Whoo-hoo!' as a stream of soldiers pour out of ships to go to battle. Every aspect of the film was one gigantic, satirical slap in the face of humanity and no one noticed.
Some may suggest that the satire was not intended but that would be incredibly insulting to screenwriter Edward Neumeier because that's what he excels at. If you didn't catch the not so subtle satire in his earlier screenplay for _Robocop_ then you're under the age of ten. Despite being so financially successful, _Starship Troopers_ is one of the most important, yet overlooked, movies of the 1990s from an intellectual point of view.
273 out of 351 people found the following comment useful :-

Best satire since Dr. Strangelove, 23 luglio 2003
Author: Max Gardner da Middletown, DE
Starship Troopers is a subtle and insidiously subversive movie that proved frighteningly prescient in the wake of post-9/11 uberpatriotism. Both Heinlein's book and Verhoeven's film are valid and interesting political statements at opposite ends of the spectrum. Heinlein's novel was criticized as fascist at the time of its publication, and for all his obvious talent as a writer I'm inclined to agree. The movie is as much a sendup of the original novel as it is a satire of jingoist American politics. It really is a shame that despite the squeaky-clean heroes plucked straight from the soaps, the Mormon extremists, the multiple-amputee mobile infantry retirees and the propaganda shorts masquerading as news, the vast majority still seems to regard Starship Troopers as a stupid action movie and, for some reason, absolutely refuse to consider that it might be something more.
10/10
248 out of 308 people found the following comment useful :-
Better -- and more disturbing -- each time I watch it, 28 luglio 2004
Author: obiwan26 da Washington, DC
This movie never fails to generate strong reactions, both positive and negative.
Much of the negative criticizes the wooden acting, soap-opera beautiful stars, and unreasonably military tactics that lead to an enormous human body count.
But that misses the whole point. The actors and plotlines are supposed to be caricatures of themselves. We are presented with a seemingly utopian society, where everyone is beautiful, the world is united under a single government, and patriotism is rampant.
The further the movie goes, the more the viewer realizes just how horrific this supposed utopia really is. Patriotism is exploited to trick young men and women into going off to a pointless war. The beautiful people are mercilessly chopped to pieces by their insectoid opponents. And the united world government uses its control of the media to brainwash the public into supporting this bloody war.
Yes, the Nazi symbolism is a little heavy-handed. But that's the whole point -- the intertwining of this "perfect" society with such a deeply evil subtext is supposed to be disturbing. What's even more disturbing is how close to our recent (American) history this movie truly is. Yes, it's a caricature, but it's a caricature of a very real and frightening phenomenon.
How different are the government propaganda ads in Starship Troopers from the "Loose Lips Sink Ships" campaign or the "10% for War Bonds" posters in 1940s U.S.? How dangerous is it to have a society where everyone looks the same, thinks the same, and acts the same, even to their own death? This is the message behind Starship Troopers, and it's a chilling one at that.
And for me, it works.
166 out of 250 people found the following comment useful :-

Its AFRAID !!, 4 ottobre 2002
Author: KelticKarma da Ireland
One of my favourite films, this one.
I love the way Verhoeven approached the idea of Man v Beast. Our "heros" are beautiful, white-teethed Americans, firm of body and morals; our villains are decapitating stick insects, cockroaches, and giant maggots.
Yet who are the real heroes ?
The white-teethed Americans are vacuous, shallow thugs. They are thrust into a war with the Bugs, whose planets, we are told, have been invaded by the Americans. The Bugs are justifiably annoyed.
I couldn't help but laugh at some of the "Nazi" parallels drawn by other reviewers. What Verhoeven is putting across in this film is not a polemic against Nazi ideology, but an attack upon American Imperialism in the latter part of the last century. He is satirising American crusades against other countries, whose inhabitants are portrayed in the American press as no better than Bugs.
Had Verhoeven wished to attack Nazism, he could have given the good guys German accents; he didn't, he gave them American accents. The "Nazi" symbolism as commented upon by other reviewers is not Nazi symbolism at all - it is totalitarian symbolism, full stop. It is right-wing, "bomb them back to the stone age" American totalitarianism.
Why do I believe this ?
Check out the scene where American kids are encouraged to stamp on cockroaches by an overly excited parent. Check out the high fives.
Verhoeven has done a mighty job here. He has made a film which has great action, great cinematography, very cute women (and boys) and yet the film still manages to take the mickey out of the New Order in a very funny and effective manner.
10/10
111 out of 145 people found the following comment useful :-

The negative buzz kept me from watching this film for awhile, but I'm glad I've seen it now!, 22 gennaio 2005
Author: Brandt Sponseller da New York City
Based on the famous Robert A. Heinlein novel, Starship Troopers is set in a world of the future where militarism is the norm, largely because we've discovered alien civilizations of huge insect-like creatures and we're at war with them. The film follows a quartet of high school friends as they make their varied ways through the military.
Starship Troopers is both a tongue-in-cheek satire of society and an intense sci-fi/action/war film filled with horror-like insect monsters and a healthy dose of graphic gore. That's a genre combination that will not please all viewers, especially if the tongue-in-cheek humor goes over their heads. For those more in tune with the genre melding, Starship Troopers promises a quick, edge-of-your-seat ride from the first moments to the last.
The film can be looked at in three sections, with slight crossovers from one section to another. The first is focused on the social satire. The cultural differences of the future are given in mostly indirectly, and occasionally, the point is what hasn't changed, or perhaps what is currently (per the film's setting) in vogue as a retro element. The second and third sections could be seen as a sci-fi Platoon (1986), with the second section focused on military basic training and the third focused on wartime. Like Platoon, the basic training scenes show order and a clear sense of purpose, while the wartime scenes show comparative chaos.
That the film could be compared to something like Platoon shows that although director Paul Verhoeven and screenwriter Edward Neumeier are aware that the material could easily be seen as absurd, they have the chops to make it believable and suspenseful at the same time.
This is not to say that Starship Troopers is a rip-off of any other movie. The film-making here is highly original, and we could almost see the entire film as a computer-based CNN-styled collection of wartime newsreels of the future. It remains quick, witty and intense throughout. My only regret is that they didn't incorporate Yes' song Starship Troopers in the score somehow.
128 out of 211 people found the following comment useful :-
Brilliant & timely critique of fascism, 11 agosto 2004
Author: Delysid da Vancouver, BC, Canada
The truth is that this is a brilliant film that, like Verhoeven's earlier "Robocop", is an insightful satire and critique of fascism and at the same time succeeds as a sci-fi thriller. It can be enjoyed at both levels, though obviously it is much richer when the viewer comprehends the satirical and critical level as well.
It's not as if the satire is so subtle it's hard to get. If anything, it hits you over the head with it. But at the same time, it is very disciplined and consistent in not tipping its hand and giving the game away, which to me makes it much more successful and enjoyable than if the satire and social critique were blatantly broadcast. That's the strange and wonderful thing about "Starship Troopers" and "Robocop" -- one viewer might totally not get it, while to another, the critical/satirical level is totally in your face and is what the film is really all about.
I don't know if I'm describing it well, but watch it with the film-makers' commentary turned on (on the DVD version), and director Paul Verhoeven and writer Ed Neumeier lay it all out very clearly: the film is about how war makes fascists of us all. Very timely today (2004) with US imperialism wreaking havoc in Iraq & Afghanistan.
On a technical level, the film is excellent. The bug special effects are top notch and the whole bug society and hierarchy is deeply thought through, as is the future Earth society's politics and technology. The acting is excellent, and the balance between the characters' interpersonal story line, the bug war story line, and the underlying political satire and critique, is perfectly handled.
A truly exceptional film, Verhoeven's best so far, topping even "Robocop" in my opinion, and fully deserving a 10 out of 10 score, which I rarely give.
84 out of 124 people found the following comment useful :-

LOVED IT!!!!!, 21 dicembre 1998
Author: Nick Pfitzner da Sydney, Australia
While some of the characters and lines in the movie were a little underdeveloped, the overriding story of the evolution of our society into an aggressive, militarist regime cannot be ignored. The action scenes were great, with flawless computer animation (how Titanic beat it for SFX I will never know) and enhancement supported by what can only be described as gore-laden prosthetics. I thought they could have left the love story out, but that's Hollywood.
Very watchable, and a nice change from the Alien movies - this is WAR, not some isolated pit-fight! I love the Alien movies, but Startship troopers just has a lot o' lead, heads, and bodies flying left, right and centre! I thought the Mobile Infantry could have used better weaponry (apparently in the novel that it's based on, the MI has powered armour with assault cannon and missile launchers etc.) to battle such a foe, but I'm just being technical.
If you want a nice beer & pretzels movie to yell and scream at, then this is it.
10 out of 10
70 out of 100 people found the following comment useful :-
An Incredibly Good Film?, 8 agosto 1998
Author: Gary V. Foss da Whittier, CA
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
This is either a really good, surprisingly intelligent satire of sci-fi and war films in general (particularly the WWII era recruitment films that Hollywood cranked out like they were actually a part of the War Department) or an incredibly vapid film that should only be watched for it's glitzy, flash-bang qualities. I choose to believe the former, otherwise I can't justify watching it as many times as I have, and I'm not nearly as smart as I think I am.... ST is only anecdotally related to Heinlien's novel, a choice made for various reasons, probably linked to the possibility of a sequel. Verhoeven raided the casts of various soap operas for his characters, a decision that exemplifies the portrayal of killing the enemy as a glamorous occupation in most war films, and the dialogue is filled with ironic machismo of the kind that can only be deeply satirical. (I hope.) FX are fantastic as are the one-liners. Don't watch this film and Arachnaphobia in the same 24 hour period or you'll spend a month's salary on bugspray. P.S. The proximity of this film to the Ra-Ra Homecoming of American troops from the Gulf War should also not be ignored....
66 out of 98 people found the following comment useful :-

It's all about the battle, not the enemy., 17 dicembre 1998
Author: Scott C. Webb (scott.webb@mpwengineering.com) da Tulsa, OK, USA
This movie is about war and militaristic society and its effect on mankind. I agree with Leonard Maltin (the professional movie critic) that everything is directly modeled on WWII battles and WWII movies.
The enemy is irrelevant, and characterizing the enemy is not important. That is why we never get any explanation for why the bugs are attacking us, how their weapons work, etc.
The movie is extremely gory to make the point that "war is hell", and war consists of a lot of "blood and guts". It is also making the point that our tolerance for violence is constantly accelerating. In this future world, it is no big deal to get stabbed through any part of the body, it is even a part of military training. Pain is of no concern, you simply call for "Medic!" and get on down the road.
The movie does not try to be cute or funny. The viewer does not have to listen to the aliens being called all sort of combinations of cuss words by the heroes.
The characters are realistic. They sometimes do the right things for the wrong reasons and vice versa. At times we are not sure who is good and who is self-motivated.
I also liked the shower scene. Just the concept of 19 year-old, physically-fit, men and women casually showering and bunking together is fascinating.
It is obviously one of those movies that you either love or hate.
76 out of 119 people found the following comment useful :-

Pure Science Fiction, 26 marzo 2004
Author: Freemheart da Chile
Again the same story of: "go to watch a movie after read many reviews telling you how bad it's the movie just to find something incredible" and really it was. I remember wait to see and action film about great space heroes, and even when I found heroes and action, I found a awesome and satirical story about the evolution of the human race and how the path of war falls in a road to hell. More than that, Starship troopers it's that kind of science fiction films with great a big special effects but at the same time a terrific script. A shocking story, more realistic and cruel than many movies about real conflicts, where you can feel the havoc and the pain of any battle. The acting it's good, the soundtrack it's one of the best works of Basil Poleoduris. After this you can read the book of Robert Heinlein founding how far goes Paul Verhoeven in every scene and every character creating. But the best of all is how everything has a reason, there's no word or scene without a meaning, even the promise of the beginning remain intact making clear some disturbing things about some character(s). An movie to watch more than two times.
Add another comment
Related Links