British couple Fiona and Nigel Dobson are sailing to Istanbul en route to India. They encounter a beautiful French woman, and that night Nigel meets her while dancing alone in the ship's ... See full summary »
Kristin Scott Thomas,
A young American woman (Sydne Rome) traveling through Italy finds herself in a strange Mediterranean villa where nothing seems right. Her visit becomes an absurd, decadent, oversexed ... See full summary »
Paulina Escobar is a political activist whose husband is a prominent lawyer in an unnamed South American country just out of a dictatorship. One day a storm forces her husband to ride home with a neighbor. That chance encounter brings up demons from her past, as she is convinced that the neighbor (Dr. Miranda) was part of the old fascist regime that tortured and raped her, while blindfolded. Paulina takes him captive to determine the truth. Paulina is torn between her psychological repressions and somber memory, Gerardo is torn between his wife and the law, and Dr. Miranda is forced to endure captivity while husband and wife seek out the uncertain truth about the clouded past. Written by
Henry G. Herron <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Both the South American country in which the movie is set is and its former regime dictatorship are unnamed. It has been alluded to that the film's source play (and hence this filmed adaptation) sets this unnamed country as unofficially really being Chile. This would surely be not surprising since the source playwright Ariel Dorfman is Chilean and the country had had a long period of dictatorship. Another hint is a visible poster in Paulina's house that reads Neruda, after the famous Chilean poet Pablo Neruda, who died few days after the coup, but the final hint that leaves no doubt is when Paulina is preparing to run away, she take some clothing and a wad of cash and if you look closely you can notice that the banknotes are chilean pesos, you can even read "Banco central de Chile" (Central Bank of Chile) on them. See more »
Dr. Miranda's moustache changes inconsistently throughout the movie. See more »
In this movie, Sigourney Weaver is thoroughly believable with her trademark edge, rarely seen in other women actors. The doctor, although obviously with selfish motives, kept me guessing until the end as to whether he was guilty of the crimes of torture she claimed he committed against her, having not seen the face of, but only having heard the voice of the man she remembered. You don't know the truth until the end. It is very riveting. Her relationship with her husband is very realistic, as well, and very revealing about both of their characters. All three roles were depicted as intensely real. I enjoyed this thriller from the moment it began to the very end. You are immediately engaged in her reality, rather than experiencing a slow build up seen with most movies. Very satisfying because no character was one-sided, but they were multi-dimensional, with each having a unique history. Bravo!
42 of 48 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?